|
reprinted from:

San Diego council to offer rival ballot proposal
By Ray Huard, Staff Writer
Copyright 2001 San Diego Union-Tribune
Article date: November 20, 2001
A
March ballot proposal to make it harder to raise or impose taxes will be
challenged by a rival measure from the San Diego City Council aimed at
killing it.
"We're clearly playing defense with something that could be very damaging
for the city," said Councilman Scott Peters yesterday.
The Taxpayers Protection Act backed by hotelier Doug Manchester would
require two-thirds voter approval before the city could raise existing
general taxes, such as the tax on hotel room bills, or impose a new tax.
Ordinarily, the Manchester measure would require approval by a simple
majority of those voting in the March election.
But the council, by an 8-1 vote yesterday, agreed to put a rival measure on
the March ballot. It would require two-thirds voter approval for any ballot
measure seeking to establish a two-thirds standard on other actions.
Councilman Brian Maienschein voted against the rival measure, saying there
are simpler ways to contest the Manchester-backed measure.
City Manager Michael Uberuaga and several council members said the Taxpayers
Protection Act could be devastating.
Not only would it make it difficult to raise or impose city taxes to keep
pace with the need for services, said Peters and Uberuaga, but they said it
also could lower the city's credit rating and make it more expensive to
borrow money for major construction projects such as sewer line replacement.
City Attorney Casey Gwinn conceded that the strategy of the rival ballot
measure is confusing.
Although the goal is to kill the Manchester measure, Gwinn said both the
Taxpayers Protection Act and the City Council measure could become law if
more than half of those voting approve the rival measure while more than
two-thirds approve the Manchester proposal.
In that case, it would take two-thirds of the voters to approve future
increases in the hotel tax and other general taxes. But it also would take a
two-thirds majority to impose a two-thirds threshold on any future
elections.
Ray Huard: (619) 542-4597;
ray.huard@uniontrib.com
In
the News
|